The Obama administration continues to dilute our national sovereignty, with the support of non elected progressive judges. Monday a federal court blocked Alabama's new law protecting itself from illegal trespassers and violent criminals. The law would begin to gaurd Alabama's citizens from criminals who illegally enter this country and destroy our economy, traffic narcotics, and disrupt our nations people.

   Alabama isn't the only state where Progressive federal judges are perverting the laws, Georgia, Utah, Indiana, and Arizona are victims as well. President Obama's objective to dissolve our borders and capture a large segment of indebted servants to vote democrat, has weakened our ability to protect ourselves and our children. Reading about Alabama's new law in the media, it will be categorized as a “tough new law” or “radical new policy”, when in essence it remains just a law.

   The radical left is often complimented on its success for stigmatizing anyone who stands against this foreign invasion as racist and bigoted. This tactic employed by the President seems to be crippling American society. For instance:

$113,000,000,000 - This year's cost of US illegal immigration. Approximately 75% of that cost is absorbed by the states.

$1117 - The average amount you and your family paid in taxes this year to support illegals.

$52,000,000,000 - The cost of educating the children of illegals. This is by far the single largest cost to the American taxpayer.

$2,700 - The average dollar amount a single illegal household costs the US federal government.

51% - The percentage of Mexican immigrant households that use at least one major welfare program. 28% use more than one.

1,400,000- The number of illegal immigrant households that use at least one major welfare program. (food stamps, WIC, school lunch, Medicaid, TANF, SSI, and public/rent-subsidized housing)

American states are desperately searching for legal solutions, but the current administration in Washington a vested interest in keeping illegals here.

  Progressives and leftist rebels are rapidly rendering the American culture helpless and lost, their goal is to make it 

irretrievable.

Watch this video above

Muslim Brotherhood Would Ban Bikinis, Alcohol

| Print |

Written by Raven Clabough

Friday, 26 August 2011 12:28

0 Despite widespread media assertions that the Egyptian revolution was intended to bring about a democratic rule, there is increasing evidence to the contrary. The Muslim Brotherhood is urging officials to consider a ban — which would particularly target tourists — on skimpy bikinis and alcohol in the streets, regulations which closely resemble Sharia law. Muhammad Saad Al-Katatny, secretary-general of Freedom and Justice, explains, "Beach tourism must take the values and norms of our society into account. We must place regulations on tourists wishing to visit Egypt, which we will announce in advance.” The Media Line reports: Egypt’s tourism industry has suffered a severe blow since the outburst of anti-regime demonstrations in January. But that did not stop the Freedom and Justice Party, the political wing of the Muslim Brotherhood, from demanding stricter regulations over what tourists can do and wear while visiting the country. The party is urging officials to ban skimpy swimwear and the consumption of alcohol on Egyptian streets. Al-Katatny indicates that his party has already taken measures to address these issues, including setting up a subcommittee to investigate Egyptian tourism. He says the party plans to amend legislation following the parliamentary elections. “Some slight changes will be made in public beaches, to make the situation better than it was before,” asserts youth director of Freedom and Justice in Giza, Ali Khafagy. “Bathing suits and mixing on the beach are things that go against our tradition. It’s not just a matter of religion. When I go to the beach I don’t want to see nudity.” Instead, Khafagy believes modest swimwear should be mandated. Tourism, once a major source of revenue for the Egyptian economy, has dropped off radically in recent months as a result of the strikes and violent protests following Mubarak’s deposal. According to Finance Minister Hazem Al-Beblawi, revenue from tourism in the next financial year, which began on July 1, will likely be only $10 billion, as opposed to the $11.6 billion in 2009/2010. These new strict regulations on tourist behavior will likely lower those figures even more. Hussam A-Shaer, head of the Egyptian tourist company Al-Masry al-Youm, contends, “Without alcohol and bathing suits, no tourists will come and we will lose $13 billion a year.” As noted by All Headline News, Islamists have always taken issue with foreign tourism: Close to 60 Western tourists were killed by Islamist terrorists in the southern city of Luxor in 1997. Tourists were also attacked in bombings in the Sinai resorts of Taba,, Sharm Al-Sheikh, and Dahab in 2004, 2005, and 2006. The proposed restrictions highlight the debate over the role of Islam in the law of the land post-Mubarak. Polls show that Egyptians are largely in favor of greater use of Islamic law, refuting claims of a more democratic Egypt. However, there is a small minority that has voiced concerns over the proposals. Hani Henry, psychology professor at the American University in Cairo, explains, This is how things began in Iran. The moderate youth wanted to implement changes, but the mullahs hijacked the revolution. The same thing is now happening here in Egypt with the Muslim Brotherhood. It makes me sick to my stomach. But the restrictions may not be limited to just bathing suits and alcohol. Abd Al-Munim A-Shahhat, a spokesman for the Salafi group Dawa, contends that Egypt’s pharaonic archaeology — which includes the pyramids and other well known monuments — should be hidden from the public, as they are covered with imagery that it un-Islamic. Comparing the Eygptian relics to the idols of pre-Islamic times, A-Shahhat claims, “The pharaonic culture is a rotten culture [and] should be covered with wax, since they are religiously forbidden.” However, even Al-Katatny does not support that proposal; he insists that the Muslim Brotherhood believes Egypt’s archeology should be protected. “This heritage belongs to everyone, and one can’t simply remove something he doesn’t like,” he observed. In an effort to save the tourism industry in Egypt, the Coalition to Support Tourism has been established, which includes a number of organizations relevant to the travel industry. The Coalition’s Facebook page reads, “Some parties want to ban tourism, or allow it while banning alcohol, certain foods and certain clothes. [A couple] renting a room will require documents proving they are married. These proposals don’t bode well, as many of you know.” Story From The New American

See no Evil, Hear no Evil

Obama admin. ignoring Islamic threat

Chad Groening - OneNewsNow - 8/11/2011 4:10:00 AM

A senior Army strategist and Pentagon advisor says it's "incredibly naïve and dangerous" for the Obama administration to go out of its way to extract Islam when it describes the threat of terrorism.

The White House recently released its "Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States" [PDF], a plan that calls for a community-based approach that includes greater support and information-sharing with local officials.

But in that 12-page plan, the administration attempted to disassociate the Islamic faith from the terrorism perpetrated by Islamic groups like al-Qaeda, saying al-Qaeda "tried to spark a conflict between faiths and divide us as Americans. But they failed." The document also claims that the "overwhelming majority" of the victims of al-Qaeda are Muslims -- and argues that one of the nation's priorities must be to counter al-Qaeda's "propaganda that the United States is somehow at war with Islam."

"We will challenge this propaganda through our word and deeds, defined by the very ideals of who we are as Americans," the plan continues. "As the president has stated repeatedly, the United States is not, and never will be, at war with Islam. Islam is part of America, a country that cherishes the active participation of all its citizens, regardless of background and belief. We live what al-Qa'ida violently rejects -- religious freedom and pluralism."

---

Results from our related poll

What's the primary reason the White House refuses to admit

Islam is a terror threat to the U.S.?

---

Lt. Col. Bob Maginnis (USA-Ret.), who currently serves as senior fellow for national security at the Family Research Council, says the Obama administration goes out of its way to paint Islam in a positive light.

"They celebrate Islam in many cases, and any derogatory statement made about Islam is condemned by the administration and its officials," he notes. "To try to extract it totally, without mention of Islam, is incredibly naïve and dangerous. Yeah, there are extremists of other stripes out there. But today, most people, when you think of extremism, if you follow the news and terrorism, you think of Islamic extremism."

Maginnis further points out that evangelist Franklin Graham was not allowed to speak at the Pentagon last year on the National Day of Prayer because he once referred to Islam as "evil."


kILLING uS BY dEGREEs

This piece really affirms are own fears; that is, what's going on in Briton can happen here. In New York City, at the First Responders Memorial, Progressive Mayor Michael Bloomberg wants to censor religion. As long as the Obama regime pretends not to notice the war on religion, its victims will continue to multiply.

thereligionof peace.com

    

	Strange Brew: Islam and Black Pride Islam's Legacy of Racism and Slavery
	One of the most bizarre manifestations of African-American pride is its contemporary identification with Islam.  Like Kwanzaa, however, Islam has a far shorter and less memorable history in Black America than most of us realize (or is usually prudent to point out).  The story goes that in 1930 Allah appeared to the people of Detroit in the form of a mysterious man named “Fard.”   Allah’s human form seemed to be of African and Arab descent and claimed to have been born in Mecca, a descendent of the prophet Muhammad.  He preached a message of racial identity and claimed that Islam was the true religion of the black people of America before they were robbed of it by the White Man.  (Ironically, the prophet Muhammad was described as a "white man" by those who knew him). In fact, Fard was really just a small-time con-man named Wallace Dodd Ford, who served three years in San Quentin for drug-dealing.  He drifted into Detroit at a time when many African-Americans were beginning to form racial identity groups around charismatic personalities such as Marcus Garvey.  Of course, racial consciousness was hardly just “a black thing” at the time, as the 1920’s were also when Ku Klux Klan influence peaked in America. Interestingly, Ford was neither of African or Arab descent, as he claimed.  He was a mix of European and Polynesian.  But he did recognize an opportunity when he saw one, and the street preacher soon built up quite a following among those who could appreciate an overtly racist theology that persists to this day in spite of its zaniness. According to Ford, and his Nation of Islam, Africans were the original and only people of the world (divine and uncorrupted) before whites were invented by an evil scientist named Yakub in a malicious experiment with tragic consequences.  Islam is the true religion, and, at some point, a spaceship will be sent by Allah to eliminate the white people from the earth. Although it may be difficult to imagine such a crackpot being given the time of day in this progressive age, in fact much more than that is awarded to Louis Farrakhan every time he plans one of his narcissistic “Million Man” marches.  Prominent political figures such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton never fail to line up behind the leader of an organization that openly espouses a message of racial superiority.  In 2005, even Bill Clinton lent his endorsement to the event – of course, he’s supposed to be our first Black President (at least for the black people who managed to survive his unwillingness to stop genocide in Liberia, Sierra Leone, the Sudan, Zaire, Burundi and Rwanda – as Clinton’s eight years in office saw more Africans lose their lives in wars than were ever brought to America in chains). It’s only fitting that the nation’s largest and most accepted racial hate organization got its start through false and fatuous circumstances.  Ford was not just an imaginative preacher of hate, but a skillful con artist as well.  He charged the nation's poorest people $10 (in the middle of the Depression) to divine their “original” Muslim name for them, and he had affairs with several women.  In 1933 (and again in 1934) he was asked to leave town by the police following a ritual killing committed by a devoted follower.  The second time around he managed to disappear so effectively that many believe he was killed by his heir, Elijah Muhammad.  Like Ford, Elijah Muhammad was also a fraud.  He fathered several children from illegitimate relationships and disillusioned several of his followers in the process.  One of these was Malcolm X, who traveled to Mecca for the Hajj at about the same time and came away with even more reasons to be disenchanted by the Nation of Islam.  Traditional Islam may be an artificial religion designed under very harsh conditions in the 7th century, but at least there isn’t talk of UFOs or evil scientists, and neither is it racially exclusive.  Malcolm was impressed to see people of all races circling the black rock together and he broke away from the Nation of Islam.  Shortly thereafter, he was killed for his principles by followers of Elijah Muhammad. The modern Nation of Islam is led by Louis Farrakhan, who broke away from Elijah Muhammad’s son in 1977, after the latter began moving the organization toward traditional Sunni practices.  Today, most Black Muslims observe mainstream Islam with a slight racial tinge, rather than the cultic heritage of Wallace Dodd Ford and Elijah Muhammad.  This includes teaching directly from the Qur'an and stressing the Five Pillars of Islam. The legacy of the NOI, however, is that many African-Americans are drawn to Islam out of racial pride, thinking that there is some sort of association with Africa.  Muslim evangelicals in the black communities and in prisons often play this up in an attempt to persuade the gullible into rejecting Christianity as the “white man’s religion.”  Now, there is terrible irony to this romanticism… and I do mean terrible. In the first place, Christianity in Africa predates Islam.  Christian missionaries were on the continent within two decades of the Crucifixion.  Secondly, unlike Christianity, Islam had no interest in missionary hospitals or the poor.  Arab contact with Black Africa was for one purpose only, plain and simple: Slavery. The awful truth is that Arabs ravaged Africa for almost a thousand years before Europeans ever began to export black slaves.  In fact, it was the foundation of slave procurement and trading established by the Muslims (usually through Jihad) that enabled the European practice. Far more Africans were swallowed up in the fourteen hundred years of Islamic slave trading than in the three centuries of European practice.  An estimated 17 to 20 million Africans were exported from their native land to the Muslim world, but this isn't the whole story.  With a transport survival rate of less than 1 in 3, Dr. John Alembellah Azumah estimates that perhaps 50 to 80 million more died in route. Here is a quote from an observer in Zanzibar that sheds light on the harsh conditions of Islamic slavery: "As they filed past, we noticed many chained together by the neck... The women, who were as numerous as the men, carried babies on their backs in addition to a tusk of ivory or other burden on their heads... It is difficult to adequately describe the filthy state of their bodies; in many instances not only scarred by [the whip], but feet and shoulders were a mass of open sores... half-starved ill-treated creatures who, weary and friendless must have longed for death." The text (quoted from Dr. Azumah's The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa) goes on to describe the fate of those who became too ill or too weak to continue the journey - as related by a Muslim "herdsman": "Spear them at once!  For, if we did not, others would pretend they are ill in order to avoid carrying their loads.  No!  We never leave them alive on the road; they all know this custom."  When asked who carries the ivory when a mother gets too tired to carry both her baby and the ivory, the herdsman replied, "She does!  We cannot leave valuable ivory on the road.  We spear the child and make her burden lighter." After Muhammad's companions overthrew the Christians in Egypt shortly after his death, they began demanding slaves from the Nubians to the south.  For over 600 years, the black African kingdom was forced to send a tribute of slaves to Cairo on a regular basis. Although the Qur'an does not distinguish between races, there is a strong legacy of racism against people of African descent in early Islam. Again quoting from The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa, Dr. Azumah provides several examples of Islam's early attitude toward blackness: The hadith in which an Ethiopian woman laments her racial inferiority to Muhammad, who consoles her by saying, "In Paradise, the whiteness of the Ethiopian will be seen over the stretch of a thousand years."   The Muslim Arab and Persian literature which depicts blacks as "stupid, untruthful, vicious, sexually unbridled, ugly and distorted, excessively merry and easily affected by music and drink."   Nasir al-Din Tusi, the famous Muslim scholar said of blacks: "The ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro."   Ibn Khaldun, an early Muslim thinker, writes that blacks are "only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings."   Classical Islamic law allows a light-skinned Muslim man to marry a black woman, but a black Muslim man is restricted from marrying a light-skinned woman.  As the literature of the time put it, "only a whore prefers blacks; the good woman will welcome death rather than being touched by a black man."   Another hadith quotes Muhammad: "Do not bring black into your pedigree." In fact, the original Arabic word for slave, "Abd," evolved into the the colloquial word for a black person after the establishment of Islam.  Muhammad owned and sold black slaves.  In fact, the pulpit of his mosque, from which he preached Islam, was built by slave labor on his order.  Even Christianity’s harshest critics could hardly picture Jesus as a slave trader.  Whereas the New Testament merely acknowledges slavery, the teachings of Islam offer explicit guidance in the details of the practice, thus endowing it with divine sanction. The Qur'an encourages sex with slaves in several places, which explains the 2-1 ratio of female to male slaves taken from Africa by Muhammad's descendents.  The Muslims were more interested in the sexual servitude of black women than the Europeans, who exported Africans for labor. As one might have guessed, the life of slaves in Muslim countries was quick and painful.  There is a reason why one doesn't find too many native blacks in Saudi Arabia or Iraq today.  Enslaved men could not bear children because they were often castrated, and the unfortunate Africans as a group did not ultimately survive the brutal treatment. By contrast, the 400,000 slaves brought to America over the course of 200 years managed to leave the most prosperous group of African people on the planet.  You can tell a lot about a people’s quality of life by the things they choose to complain about.  While the life expectancy in some African countries is less than 19, what with disease, abject poverty, starvation and kleptocratic dictators, African-Americans are actually demanding financial compensation (reparations) for not having to live in those conditions. So ingrained is slavery in Islam that the religion's holiest city, Mecca (site of the Haj pilgrimage), was a slave trading capital.  Up until the 20th century, Mecca served as the gateway to the Muslim world for slaves brought out of Africa.  Azumah notes: "It became a custom for pilgrims to take slaves for sale in Mecca or buy one or two slaves while on Haj as souvenirs to be kept, sold or given as gifts." The last slaves were traded there openly in 1960! Arab enslavement of black Africans continues to this day in the Muslim world, particularly in the Sudan, Niger, and Mauritania.   Slavery would most certainly exist today in the same form that it did for more than a thousand years in the Arab world were it not for the Western Christian-based nations “imposing their values on Muslim lands” by putting an end to it.  The horrific situation that we described of slaves in Zanzibar was forcibly suppressed by the Europeans. There is not, and never has been, an abolition movement within Islam. Unlike the West, the Muslim world has yet to offer an apology for slavery.  The institution is ingrained in the Qur'an.  To admit that it is a mistake would be to admit the fallibility of the Qur'an and bring its divine origin into question.  Even today, Muslims act as if Islamic slavery was a favor done to the millions of unfortunate men, women and children who were forcibly uprooted from their native lands and sent to lives of sexual and menial servitude deep in the Islamic world. Slavery was not entirely race-based in Islamic history (although it eventually became illegal to enslave an Arab).  Hungary was pillaged of 3 million people over a 150 year period, and Muslim slave traders raided European coasts for well over 1000 years, killing, raping and taking slaves. But, perhaps the most conspicuous example of overt racism in Islam is the genocide in present-day Sudan by the Arab-Islamic government and the refusal of Muslim organizations around the world to condemn it.  Over two million black Africans have died from Arab aggression in the Christian south.  And 200,000 more were killed by Arab militias over the last four years in Darfur.  The Arabs are known for rampaging through villages and hacking black Africans to death in the name of Jihad while screaming things like, "Kill the slaves!" Although the Darfurians are mostly Muslim as well, there is little to no attention placed on their plight by international Muslim organizations.  Despite being repeatedly challenged on the issue,  the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), for example, has never bothered to condemn the Islamic Republic of Sudan for the Arab massacre of Africans. Compare this to the outrage, sympathy and money that is poured out on the Palestinian people... who are Arab.  Yet, the number of Palestinian civilians killed in their relentless conflict with Israel over the last 40 years is less than the average number of Africans killed by Islam each month. Even in the earliest days, racism against blacks was a fringe part of Islam.  At one time there was a law that mandated the death penalty for anyone suggesting that Muhammad was black.  Perhaps it is for this reason that quite a few hadith mention the "whiteness of the prophet" - explicitly referring to his skin color. Africa and African-Americans owe absolutely nothing to Islam, because it has done nothing good for them.  It inspires slavery, but not abolition.  It may not be the “White man’s religion,” but that certainly doesn’t make it the Black man’s.   President Obama continues providing Muslim countries with aid; Fox News estimates the President's 2011 foreign assistance request of $34.5 billion, 60% or $20.1 billion goes to Muslim nations, or those where a majority practice Islam. About 33% or the total budget, or $11.6 billion is awarded to Arab countries. Yet, where is the monetary or even military aid for the millions and millions of Christians being slaughtered and oppressed in these nations, it's not there. Islamic Fascism is the sole reason these countries even need aid; there are mega wealthy leaders in these countries and then there are the impoverished serfs whose backs they've made their fortunes from. It's under the feet of those serfs where you find the millions of Christians being martyred each year. This is the story of a very fortunate Christian woman: Monica Dra and her husband heard the marchers outside their small home in Nigeria on July 26, 2009. They heard the chants of "Allahu Akbar" and wondered what the night would hold for them and other Christians in their village. HELP VOMEDICAL provide care to victims of persecution like Monica Dra. "We had heard rumors all night that there were going to be problems," Monica told VOM, "and now I could hear them walking and slaughtering people as they went." Monica's husband, Daniel James, grabbed her, and they ran outside to escape the radical Muslim mob. But the radicals grabbed Daniel and hacked him to death with a machete. Monica began to run, with her Bible and hymn book tucked under her arm. But members of the chanting mob grabbed her and began striking her with machetes. Seeing a cross on a chain around Monica's neck, a militant began to chop at her neck, nearly decapitating her. By the time Monica got to the hospital, she could only breathe through the gaping wound left by the lethal blade. "I thought, 'I am a Christian,'" she said. "I am dying today." But Monica didn't die. After six surgeries to repair her throat and close the wound in her neck, doctors were able to save her voice. Through VOMedical, Monica, a poor widow with a 5-year-old child, received excellent medical care and post-op follow-up. Thanks to generous donations from VOM supporters, Monica is among the more than 600 Christians who have received medical care after being injured because of their Christian faith. Monica now needs only one more surgery to regain her normal speaking voice. "Now that I have my strength back, I have forgiven my attackers," Monica said. "Now I have more courage to serve the Lord much more." We don't know where the next attack will occur. Nigeria? Indonesia? China? But VOMedical is committed to serving those who are injured by acts of persecution. Your generous support enables us to act immediately, providing care and healing to our persecuted family members. killing US BY degree S

Pacifism: An Irresponsible Endeavour

Thu Aug 25 07:07pm EDT

Indiana college not playing the national anthem sparks debate

By Jeff Eisenberg

Visiting fans who attend a basketball game, or any sporting event, at Goshen College this season may be surprised by the patriotic song they hear over the loudspeakers minutes before tipoff.
The Northern Indiana school has decided to play "America the Beautiful" prior to sporting events instead of the "Star-Spangled Banner" because the lyrics better fit the pacifist ideals of a Mennonite campus whose motto is "Healing the World, Peace by Peace."
Adopting "America the Beautiful" is Goshen president James E. Brenneman's attempt to end a debate over the national anthem that has engulfed his school for almost two years.
Goshen College had never played the national anthem before a sporting event until March 2010 when the school began playing an instrumental version at the urging of Brenneman. In a lengthy statement explaining the change in policy, Brenneman said, "I am committed to retaining the best of what it means to be a Mennonite college, while opening the doors wider to all who share our core values."
[Video: Michigan football team sports new rock fight song]
The practice of playing the national anthem before games was immediately controversial among the 1,000-person student body, 58 percent of which belong to the Mennonite faith built on pacifism and global citizenship. Complaints from students and alumni eventually caused school officials to put an end to the short-lived ritual of playing the anthem at sporting events in June.

What bothered many at Goshen College about the "Star-Spangled Banner" was imagery from the War of 1812 that Francis Scott Key included. Goshen spokesman Richard R. Aguirre told the Chicago Tribune that lyrics such as "the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air" were "inconsistent to the entire message we were trying to send."

Seeking a compromise that would satisfy both factions at his school, Brenneman considered numerous patriotic songs before announcing last Friday that "America the Beautiful" would be the replacement for the national anthem at Goshen. In a statement released that day, Brenneman explained his choice by pointing out that it's easily recognizable, it honors the country and it fits with Goshen's core values.
"Though some may or may not agree with the alternative recommended here, I call now on each one of us to move beyond this decision and turn our attention to other important matters before us," Brenneman said. "May God help Goshen College become one of the most welcoming places on earth for all who come to our campus."
Brenneman's attempt at compromise may have satisfied some students and alumni, but the decision has sparked protest and derision from many outsiders.
"Goshen College should be banned from NCAA competition until they start playing the National Anthem again," one man tweeted. Wrote another, "I don't agree w/Goshen College decision but it's America and it's cool for them to do what they want.."

Pacifism: An Irresponsible Endeavour
KILLING US bY dEGREES

Coward on Parade

President Obama's official reign of terror may not exceed one term, but the horror of his Presidency will remain for generations. Read this:

TAIPEI - Bowing to Chinese pressure, the U.S. will deny Taiwan's request for 66 new F-16C/D fighter aircraft, a Taiwan Ministry of National Defense (MND) official said. "We are so disappointed in the United States," he said.

Well guess what buddy, you aren't the only one disappointed. We are at a point in history where it is to our extreme peril not to show China we have a backbone. This is only a part of the Presidents narrative, bowing to the enemy and alienating friends. The sole reason for any cohesiveness in this crazy world is America's military might. What quasi hippies, pacifist, and morons do not understand is that this is an insidious and cruel world. Since man has existed, 99% percent of the time this Earth has been ruled by force, tyranny, and injustice, this is fact, this is history.

What about Syria? This was a statement by a defector from President Al-Assad’s killing machine “After seeing how they killed people, I realized that the regime is prepared to massacre everyone,” Why is this murderous maniac allowed to annihilate dissenters and crush them like bugs, yet our President doesn't feel the need to shell out 500 million tax payer dollars like he did in Libya, for humanitarian aid? Inconsistency and weakness?

BEIRUT (AP) — Masked gunmen dragged Syria's best-known political cartoonist from his car before dawn Thursday, beat him severely and left him bleeding along the side of a road days after he compared Syria's president to Moammar Gadhafi, human rights activists said.---

And this is gentle, the cartoonist was only beaten, he didn't get acid poured on his face and he wasn't stoned to death. Must be feeling very lucky.

What's going on with Israel? Never in recent history has an American president allowed our relationship with Israel to be so confrontational and indecisive. Muslim aggression is of epidemic proportion and President Obama has not only turned a blind eye, but seems to be appeasing it. Israel has had it's back to the wall ever since its existence, the Muslim enemy is not simply protesting. Human Events: Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, a 43-year-old Iranian woman, is facing death by stoning this week for adultery, a capital crime in Iran. This is a common occurrence in the Muslim world, multiply this atrocity by ten thousand, it's a basic part of the culture. This tragic plague is not isolated in third world nations! In Buffalo New York, a moderate Muslim by the name of Muzzammil Hassan beheaded his lovely wife. This is a man who with his wife created a television network for modern Muslim Americans. The premise behind this network was to show ignorant westerners that Muslims are much more than their stereotypes may suggest. Striking.

As a citizen of The United States, I am angry that our President is apologizing for America. Upon entering office his first action was to toss out the bust of Winston Churchill, given to us by our most complete ally, England. In 2008, President Obama became responsible for our country, since then he has cast this nation aside. He is letting Mexico devour our borders and infiltrate our nation with violence and narcotics. Afraid he might lose an Hispanic vote Obama looks away, letting ranchers and tax payers suffer. He illegally gave Mexican gangs high powered weapons, some of which were used to slaughtered innocent Americans.

The danger of President Obama's repulsion of traditional and successful America will leave lasting cracks in our foundation. He has scarred unborn generations of our countries men and women, by weakening our defenses and bankrupting our nation. As I have said and history has proven, peace is only afforded by brute force. Many infantile liberals will complain about weapons and military spending, but without them these same people would live in a very different world. America's most immediate risk's are China, Islam, Mexico, economic chaos, and an amoral society; President Obama has accelerated the dangers in all of these. Since the Obama regime has been placed in control of America:

Iran has accelerated their nuclear weapon program, unapologetic and without consequence.

Terrorist organization Hezbollah has acquired long range missiles.

2008 A Russian aerial bombardment began in the break away region of Georgia. In the country former President Bush called “ A beacon of liberty” we helplessly watched while Russia rolled out 150 tanks. Georgia a potential NATO member and eager US ally was left to fend for itself. Obama, hot on the campaign trail had these words of wisdom "I think it is important at this point for all sides to show restraint and to stop this armed conflict.” All sides! Restraint? Believe me that was a one sided smack down, as Russia took off it's shirt and flexed its chest muscles. This was their way of saying, “And what are you gonna do about it America?” This would give them the added testosterone to annihilate Obama on the New-START treaty.

President Obama gave in to Russia and abandoned the plan for a European missile shield, without getting ANY concessions from the Russians. New-Start was intended to protect European nations from attacks by rogue nations like Iran and North Korea.

The President lied about withdrawing our military from Iraq and Iran.

Obama blindly supported the dictator in Honduras, Manual Zelaya a golf buddy of Hugo Chavez who wanted to nullify the Honduran constitution in an attempt to run another term. The Honduran military swiftly and legally withdrew the President from office, just as the constitution states. Obama had Hillary Clinton threaten the small country if Zelaya was not reinstated.

Obama supported rebels in Egypt, he interrupted our daily broadcast to explain how this was a lesson in democracy. When all was said and done we are discovering a country more radical and more anti-American than the one under Hosni Mubarak.

It becomes exhausting watching this man unravel the remaining pieces of what our founders created, the American left should be proud. The less our enemies fear us the more peril we are facing. Countries no longer refrain from committing atrocities for fear of American retaliation, this will damage us and our ally's. The consequence Of President Obama's utter failure in our foreign policy and his distaste for American exceptionalism will bring this country to it's knees. Let's pray the next President can quickly regain the momentum that Ronald Reagan had us on.

kILLING US bY dEGREES

www.killingusbydegrees.com

story from The Blaze

Education Georgia Professors Offer Courses to Illegal Immigrants

ATHENS, Ga. (The Blaze/AP) — As college students return to campus in Georgia, a new state policy has closed the doors of the five most competitive state schools to illegal immigrants, but a group of professors has found a way to offer those students a taste of what they’ve been denied.
The five University of Georgia professors have started a program they’re calling Freedom University. They‘re offering to teach a rigorous seminar course once a week meant to mirror courses taught at the most competitive schools and aimed at students who have graduated from high school but can’t go to one of those top schools because of the new policy.
“This is not a substitute for letting these students into UGA, Georgia State or the other schools,” said Pam Voekel, a history professor at UGA and one of the program’s initiators. “It is designed for people who, right now, don’t have another option.”
The policy, adopted last fall by the university system’s Board of Regents, bars any state college or university that has rejected academically qualified applicants in the previous two years from admitting illegal immigrants. That includes five Georgia colleges and universities: the University of Georgia, Georgia Tech, Georgia State University, Medical College of Georgia and Georgia College & State University. Illegal immigrants may still be admitted to any other state college or university, provided that they pay out-of-state tuition.
The new rule came in response to public concerns that Georgia state colleges and universities were being overrun by illegal immigrants, that taxpayers were subsidizing their education and legal residents were being displaced. A study conducted by the university system‘s Board of Regents last year found that less than 1 percent of the state’s public college students were illegal immigrants, and that students who pay out-of-state tuition more than pay for their education.

“What we’re hoping is that people in decision-making positions will reconsider the policy,” said Reinaldo Roman, another of the organizing professors. “It goes counter to our aims. We have invested enormous resources in these young people. It makes sense to give them a chance at an education.”
For now the course will simply serve to expose the students to a college environment and challenge them intellectually. It will not likely count for credit should the students be accepted at another school, but the professors said they’re seeking accreditation so credits would be transferable at some point in the future.
The five founding professors all work for UGA, but they stress that the program has no connection to the institution. UGA referred a request for comment to the Board of Regents. Regents spokesman John Millsaps said faculty members are generally free to do whatever they want with their free time as long as it doesn’t interfere with their responsibilities as employees of the university system. But he said he didn’t know about enough about the program to comment on this specific case.
Once the professors hatched their plan – which was suggested by an illegal immigrant community member who works with a lot of illegal immigrant teens – they reached out to professors at prestigious schools nationwide to sit on a national board of advisers. One of them is Pulitzer Prize winning author and MIT professor Junot Diaz, who calls policies barring illegal immigrants from state schools cruel and divisive. He said he’s ready to help Freedom University succeed.
“Whatever they ask of me. I’ll do everything and anything I can,” he wrote in an email. “This clearly is going to be a long fight.”
With professors donating their time and a local Latino community outreach center offering a space for free, the program has few costs. They’ve started an Amazon.com wish list asking people to donate textbooks for students and gas cards for volunteers who will drive students to and from class.
Dressed in a black fleece jacket and tan cargo shorts and carrying a black backpack during a protest rally Tuesday at UGA against the policy, 25-year-old Karl Kings looked like he could be headed to class. However, Kings says he’s an illegal immigrant who was brought to the U.S. when he was a year old from a country in Asia that he declined to identify.
“Pretty much, I would be a Georgia boy except I wasn’t born here,” he said. “I grew up here my whole life.”
After graduating from high school in suburban Atlanta in 2004, he dreamed of going to college but couldn’t afford to pay out-of-state tuition. He’s gotten by doing odd jobs, but has had to turn down some more stable or challenging job offers because they required proof of eligibility to work in the U.S. He was filling out an application for Freedom University at the end of the rally this week.
The program is currently taking applications, with the first class, American Civilization I, set to start Sept. 8. The five professors will rotate teaching the seminar course on their own time at an off-campus location. All qualified applicants will likely be accepted unless there are so many applications that space constraints force them to limit admissions, said Lorgia Garcia Pena, another of the founding professors.
Leeidy Solis,16, was brought to the U.S. illegally by her parents from Mexico when she was 2. A high school senior in Athens, she wants to become a veterinarian. She finds it hard to listen to her friends discuss where they‘re applying to college because she’s not sure she will be able to go. She’s looking into where she might get a grant or scholarship to pay for her education.
Her parents are thinking of packing up and heading back to Mexico. They are encouraging her to apply to college there and go with them. But she doesn’t remember Mexico and all her friends and cultural experiences are here, so she wants to stay. She said she’s definitely keeping Freedom University in mind.
“Even if they don’t count it as a credit, at least we as students can experience what it’s like to take a real college class,” she said

Libya's Lost Cause

For the last several years I have been screaming at the top of my lungs, nobody heard my desperate please. I said, “Listen, our kids are dying in the desert for nothing, we will never change the hearts and minds of these Muslim populations. These countries hate America and we will never, EVER, peacefully coexist. More over they will never stop adamantly fighting for our violent demise.

Still, to this day progressive juggernauts like John McCain and Lindsey Graham spew statements such as this, “ The end of the [Gadhafi] regime in Libya is a victory for the Libyan people and for the broader cause of freedom in the Middle East and throughout the world,” Are you kidding me? If a fascist Islamic gang violently overthrows an aging dictator with the help of NATO, this is a victory for freedom? Gadhafi, an early supporter of the Obama administration, is a megalomaniac. He is a rapist, a killer, a terrorist, etc etc. The studious young rebels replacing him are avid Sharia enthusiast, they are proprietors of oppression, degradation, poverty, and hopelessness. C'mon, you know this.

Recently republican golden boy Mitt Romney explained his version of the same tired talking points to Neil Cavuto. Mitt reasoned that democracy was being served up simply because a tyrant was being removed from office, he seemed pleased. This misleading rhetoric is not predicated by factual history, what about the Soviet Union? Lenin was replaced by a maniacal killer with acute paranoia and blood lust. Joseph Stalin was not the former dictators first choice, Lenin believed Stalin's power hungry aspirations exceeded even that of his own, Satan himself believed his protege might be too evil, imagine that. If history serves me right, Satan, I mean Stalin murdered over 60 million people that we are aware of, through starvation, assassination, war, and other insideous means. Yet, the American left thought he was just Jazzy, they too probably proclaimed him as the pillar of democracy. 

The people telling us the uprising in the Middle East and North Africa is a demonstration in democracy, are misleading. The terrorist and useful idiots are not democratic, they are fascist. Just as every socialistic uprising throughout history, the masses are convinced that the suppression they've existed through their entire life is a product of their merciless dictator, which it usually is. Then a well organized group of radicals, usually funded by some secret powerful elites with an abundance of wealth involved in the outcome, tells the masses we need to be a free and democratic society. When all is said and done the rebels seize power, the elite make their fortune, and the poor are subjected to a new and improved life of tyranny. In the case of the "Arab Spring" Iran and fascist Islam are pulling the strings.

The Obama administration has kowtowed to the Middle Eastern Terror apparatus since being placed in office, not to mention simultaneously shunning Israel. In doing so he's proved to be 2011's Nevil Chamberlain, on steroids. But, what accounts for our other progressive politicians seemingly lack of the obvious. Were they misled by the main stream medias false propaganda?

"The people of Libya are showing that the universal pursuit of dignity and freedom is far stronger than the iron fist of a dictator." Barack Obama

“action needed to be taken and we needed to work with our allies and take concrete steps to remove Qadhafi from power and constrain his attacks on the small 'd' democrats in the east of the country.” - Karl Rove

The US has rebuffed a personal appeal from Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi to US President Barack Obama, repeating that he must resign and go into exile.

Referring to Barack Obama as "our son", the Libyan leader urged the US leader to end an "unjust war against a small people of a developing country", and dismissed the rebels as "al-Qaeda" militants.

In response to the letter, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that "I don't think there is any mystery about what is expected from Mr Gaddafi". -BBC

Progressive politicians like Rove, McCain, Obama, Graham, Clinton, are well aware that peace is not an option, it never has been. There is nothing beneficial to The United States coming from the "Arab Spring", yet the American tax payer remains a slave unto these politicians misguided aspirations.

kILLING US BY dEGREES

Michael Vick: Vitcim of Poverty

 Michael Vick, a tragic casualty of black oppression and racially motivated impoverishment spoke out recently. Apparently feeling comfortable with his newly rediscovered wealth and fame, Mr. Vick spoke a bit more candidly to reporters. "Yeah, you got the family dog and the white picket fence, and you just think that's all there is" This is code for simple white people who have no clue as to what adversity means. Then Vick goes on to say, "Some of us had to grow up in poverty-stricken urban neighborhoods, and we just had to adapt to our environment." This is code for "I was justified".

   It's funny, because I know a lot of poverty stricken Americans who don't live in million dollar mansions and still refrain from fighting dogs for money. As a matter of fact as seductive as electrocuting a canine might seem to be, all poor people don't gravitate to it. Fighting man's best friend for money might retrieve a dollarless dude from the brink of a cardboard cabin, but that's not the case for Vick. He is guilty of torturing and slaughtering helpless animals whose only aim is to please their master. Michael Vick raised these animals to violently rip their opponents to shreds or simply serve as bait for other vicious dogs. 

   The fact that the million dollar quarter back fought a domesticated animal for money isn't what's so disturbing here, although it should be. The derangement is that he doesn't understand how truly deviant and psychopathic this undertaking is. He didn't simply throw Fido the family pet into a fighting pit to keep a roof over his head and pay for his mothers life saving operation. Vick preyed on these poor dogs. He beat them and broke them down, he let these animals die a torturous and painful death. He took pleasure in watching them struggle for air while they were being drowned to death. He took puppies that children usually hug and kiss and tormented them, turning them into killers or bait for killers. He and his friends laughed and mused on their million dollar estate while these dogs were being forced to die.

  Mentally disturbed people like Michael Vick cannot be rehabilitated, you can't teach a person that sadistic torture and cruel inhumane treatment is wrong. If a person didn't have that moral axiom to begin with, it cannot be taught or implemented. A man at the end of his rope or forced into a corner can do horrific things, but a man's justification of his actions never supersedes his moral line in the sand. Michael Vick has proven himself as weak and pathetic. If poverty and hopelessness are the environments in which children must sacrifice their souls, why isn't Vick giving the majority of his wealth save them? 

Vick, 27, and three associates were indicted by a federal grand jury in Richmond, Virginia, on a conspiracy count alleging they bought and sponsored dogs in an animal fighting venture and traveled across state lines to participate in illegal activity, including gambling.

According to the indictment, dogs that didn't show enough fighting spirit, or that lost matches, were put to death by a variety of methods, including shooting, drowning, hanging and electrocution. Prosecutors allege that on one occasion earlier this year, Vick participated in killing eight dogs. -CNN NEWS

​

kILLING us BY DEgrees