glockrussmanscorner@gmail.com

“Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and institute new government . . .”—United States Declaration of Independence

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

America is gone (preface)

Reality is, every single anti-government website, conspiracy website, and limited government website, only goes as far as their allowed. To actually believe that American citizens are free, is idiotic. For close to 100 years our government has not existed, we are not the country of T. Jefferson, G. Washington, Franklin or whoever. We are the government of the ruling elite. America is gone.

If you agree with me, please let me know.
www.killingusbydegrees.com

Monday, February 11, 2013

When the Right isn't right

Assuming our republican politicians have an IQ higher than let's say dirt, why would they propose such idiocy? They are pushing the narrative that in order to increase the square footage of the electoral tent they must sellout a degree or two. They are cautiously persuading us (the right) that the only way an R will regain the White House, is if we go a little fag, not all the way, but a bit. But, excuse me, however, if the republican partly (sp OK) goes full fuckin' force, they will garner nothing. If the following list of proposals, were they to be requested by the republican partly, were made, the net total of converts would be zero.

  1. Grant absolute amnesty.
  2. Personally perform gay marriage.
  3. Go green.
  4. Purge the party by 50% of its wrinkled pastey whites, replaced by black lesbian women in wheelchairs. (that covers 4 traits trump to white man)
  5. Create and support draconian gun laws.
  6. Etc, Etc,

So put your thinking cap on. If the republican partly adopted these ridiculous 5 ideals to their platform, how much would they gain? Almost zero. So if 1+1 =2, 5+2 =7, then why are they pretending to believe the right must be flexible? Why? Because the republican partly isn't right thinking at all, they are progressives.

You Swine Happy Now? Black Kills White to Right Historical Wrongs

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Never be rude to a faggot by (Andy Nowicki alternative right)

Never Be Rude to a Faggot Culliver's Travails: media lynching in progress
For those not following the hype and hullaballoo surrounding the most overhyped and hyper-hullaballooed event in the history of the world, it seems that in the run-up to Super Bowl XLVII, a professional football player has expressed the simply unacceptable sentiment that he actually finds it quite undesirable to take showers and walk around naked in the company of gay men.
The offender is one Chris Culliver, defensive back for the San Francisco 49ers. Earlier this week, over the course of a lighthearted radio interview with a jocular interlocutor on press day, Culliver revealed that he has a strict no homo policy when it comes to goings-on in the locker room. He’d rather not be around any of those “sweet”-acting, lispy, limp- wristed characters while in a state of undress: “Uh-uh,” Culliver stated emphatically at the prospect, “no way!”
Needless to say, all progressive-minded folk interested in showing others how righteous they are immediately jumped all over the suddenly embattled NFL jock for saying such an outrageous, “ignorant” thing. Equally as predictably, soon afterwards a chastened Culliver, looking like a frightened little boy who’s been called to the principal’s office, issued a meek apology to all right-thinking people everywhere, whom he deeply wounded with his viciously hateful, awful, horrible, despicable, dastardly, and completely terrible remarks. (For his penance, he’s been assigned—what else—“sensitivity training,” with representatives of the San Francisco LGBT community! Will he be forced to strip in the company of a bunch of flaming, leering queens in order to demonstrate having conclusively overcome his homophobia? Enquiring minds wonder…)
Presumably, Chris Culliver ought to be perfectly fine with the notion of being in intimate quarters with men who embrace the love that, until recently, dared not speak its name (and now apparently won’t ever shut the hell up). He shouldn’t fret about being ogled, or fear being subjected to frisky, freaky episodes of frottage by fellow athletes who happen to be light in the cleats (not that there’s everything wrong with that). And if he’s afraid of dropping the soap in the shower, well, that’s just cuz he’s a reprehensible bigot. Once Culliver is properly sensitivity-trained, he’ll come to know that gay men don’t really like to look at naked men’s pecs, penises, and posteriors…
Oh wait; they do? Uh…
Well then, maybe he’ll learn that, even if gay men like to ogle his naked body, he just needs to deal with it, because they’re gay and they get to do that, and not liking it is hate, plain and simple. Fearing the (homosexual) male gaze is only baby steps away from digging up Matthew Shepard and Tyler Clementi, and killing them all over again; such a repulsive heterosexist proclivity towards gay zombie genocide must be eliminated so that tolerance can reign supreme.
Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Or something.
(Cue the wank gesture and the insouciantly rolled eye.)