glockrussmanscorner@gmail.com

“Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and institute new government . . .”—United States Declaration of Independence

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Torii Hunter PC Defiant?

In a recent interview, Angel's slugger Torri Hunter candidly discussed his feelings about the prospect of (having) (playing with)an openly gay teammate. Recently Torii Hunter talked about playing with a gay teammate, in a candid interview. In a recent interview Angel's outfielder Torii Hunter, candidly discussed the whole “gay teammate” issue. The issue quickly created a ripple in the cesspool of PC America, and rapidly recessed into a non disturbance. Had Hunter been white, he would have been forced into apologizing just to salvage his career, but that's another story for another time.                                                                                                                             
                                                     Me? I wasn't supposed to catch that ball Torii...
                                                                                   
Even Torii Hunters free pass to state the obvious was met with resistance by the Progressive PC police. From what I gather, the crux of Hunter's objection with a homosexual teammate is his devout respect for his religion, Christianity. If he were a Muslim who maybe felt a little queer around a queer, it might be a valid contention, but today even black Christians get marginalized. David Brown (Yahoo Sports) writes, “using Christianity to hide behind bigotry is totally unfair to Christians who don't consider being gay not right”
Although Hunter disparaged no one, being as gentle as possible, the fact that he doesn't abide by Browns definition of Christianity, makes him a bigot. 
 
David Brown is just another PC Nazi who believes he's entitled to qualify a legitamite Christian, screw the millions of believers who might disagree. The reality is that being repulsed by homosexuality is natural for some, thinking it's gross isn't a learned behavior. Being forced to accept it is!

To further exploit Brown's idiocy, he writes, “Did the Tigers get to the World Series in 2012 because Justin Verlander is in a relationship with Kate Upton? How would it matter if Verlander dated someone named Bob Upton?” He's serious. Well let me think.... Would a guy having sex Kate Upton look at the athletic body of his teammate with the “I'd like to bang you” eye's”? Not likely. How about a healthy average homosexual? Hmmmm probable. There is the issue.
 




 

Sunday, December 30, 2012

The Single Mom Myth

The Single Mom Myth

The single mother, a rapidly growing phenomenon, given the stamp of approval from America's most studious mediums. A one time mantle of dysfunction has found legitimacy in post-nut sack America. Feminist and their beta-male bitches running the machine from the national news rooms to print, Hollywood and beyond, wield such power the Church fears casting a sideways look. The single mom moniker is synonymous with strength, liberation, and independence.

The divorce rate is a staggering 35%, close to 70% of which are initiated by the woman, at least it's documented that way. I would suggest a modest 85-90% of divorces are ultimately decided by the woman. And why not? They've been absolved of consequence, empowered by guilt free abandonment, and objectively lobotomized to the ruin of their wake. The 15 year old pregnant daughter in no way reflects an abysmal failure of a parent. The faggy kid nurtured by the absence of light in his basement game-room, who might slip through the cracks of teen suicide to molest and murder his peers.

The child being raised by a divorced or single mom, has yet to discover the liberation and empowerment from their predicament. The advantages of their peers residing in duel parent homes is lost in a culture that references the hags from The View for objective reasoning. The child who publicly celebrates growing up with their single mom, is a child who is reaping the rewards of lax discipline. Healthy marriage can't idiot proof your kid, their chances of going haywire might statistically increase. What remains undeniable is the fear, confusion, self doubt, and sadness a child will repeatedly encounter as a result of their parents choice.

The man's antiquated notion of divorce not being an option, usually puts him at odds with the single mom. For most men divorce isn't a rebirth into a world supported by government programs, talk shows, and magazines. The woman will exclaim that trying to “make it work” and not leaving isn't healthy for the children, she did it for them. She won't confess to total control as the only viable option, short of castration when trying to “make it work” or not leaving. She will do everything possible to sabotage the relationship, that she actually decided to leave long ago. The single mom has most likely already hedged her bets before she walks.

There exist covert agenda responsible for cultivation of the single mom myth, nefarious to some and idealistic to others. Cosigned and propagated by the same movement whose reconstructed world advocates lesbian adoption, prepubescent gender reassignment, and anti-death penalty pro abortion reasoning. If they were prohibited from hijacking the American flag, theirs would simply read, “If it feels good, Do it!”


Friday, December 28, 2012

11 random non anti-Semite Confessions

11 confessions of a non-Jew
 

I must really preface this small rant by qualifying my seemingly narrow scope. Firstly, I don't hate Jewish peoples (per say) or any other group, by definition. Oddly enough, the same doesn't apply for what group I inherently support, without so much as an inquisitive peep. Up until this moment I blindly supported Israel and the Jewish movement, no questions asked, why? What was the reason for my whole sale unwavering support of the Jew?
The thing is, I never really gave it much consideration. I have more reason to be anti-Jew than pro-Jew, after all they did kill Jesus? As a participating member of a monotheist religion, Christianity, aren’t I to believe that Jewish people are sharing the same hell-bound bus as the Muslims? Why do so many of my brethren support a religion not only contrary to ours, but one that directly had a hand in crucifying the Son of God?
Now in the realm of Christianity there resides a (sect?) known as Zionist. Briefly, Christian Zionist enthusiastically support the notion of A Jewish State, Israel to be precise. Where Jews from the four corners of the Earth must rally, as a prerequisite to the returning Messiah and ensuing the Apocalypse. Until all these Jews are collected we're just spinning our wheels, I guess. It's not like they drop the property value of the neighborhood?
Even Glenn Beck, whose a Mormon, is overtly tied at the hip with the Jewish zeitgeist. Beck has shed tears on multiple occasions when defending the Jewish peoples. I must admit though, I have always believed the Jew to be residing on the right side of history, regardless of what Beck or Pat Robertson have told me.
And believe me, this short writing is in no way my resignation from the world of objective reasoning and my caring credentials are still valid. I am also not convinced that Jewish people are on the wrong side of history, just merely suggesting that I loosen the traumatizing stigma that's dictated my world view.
For instance, for a collection of people defined by their ardent religious belief, I have yet to meet a considerate Jewish person. (Less my current employers, they have been outstanding) Objective eval, I have not yet walked away from an encounter with anything positive. Matter of fact, if I were to generalize, I've yet to meet a Jew who wasn't a kinda prick. Someone who would hire Bashar Al-Assad if that meant achieving their goal. So I asked around, these are just11 of the confessions I heard from non-Jews.

I have yet to meet a Jewish person_____
  1. Who has one moral caring fiber of humanity.
  2. Who runs a charity.
  3. Who didn't have money.
  4. Who didn't seem to belong to some exclusive club, for which I could not join.
  5. Who actually stood for something (morally).
  6. Who didn't badmouth everyone.
  7. Who told me they love America.
  8. Who had conservative values.
  9. Who liked country music.
  10. Who even liked America.
  11. Who didn't look left and right when initiating a convo regarding a black person.

     

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Cashing out on Stevens

It doesn't require a degree, or even a certificate for that matter, to understand why the military never aided the Consulate as he helplessly perished in Libya. The modern American military, as directed by the currant regime, does not use force to protect American lives. The military exclusively protects American interest both monetary and strategic. It is apparent that the four extinguished lives couldn't even justify the millions required just to turn the "on switch" for a military operation.

Some might argue, one theory for the gross negligence, was the fear of illumination upon the illegal activity conducted on the premises. I don't know

     "Wait the President said not to shoot this man" 
"It figures, that bleeding heart liberal"
"Yeah, he said he would not approve the dispersal of any ammunition directed at this man. It's far too costly."
"Politically? The cost of human life, huh?"
"No, the cost of ammo, he said run him over!"   

C.A.T.P.C.W.A.D.F.D.P.M.E.  (still searching for shorter acronym) 
Citizen against this pathetic charade of why American soldiers die and are forced to destroy peoples of the Middle East  
 

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

8 Confessions from a (random) White Man

8 Confessions from a (random) White Man

    1. I've been passionately reunited with boxing by the super sib's, Vitali & Wladimir Klitschko.
    2. I can't comprehend the hypnotic allure to country music, and in the same thought sequence, contend that Rap should even qualify as a legitimate musical genre.
    3. I wonder why black individualism was revoked, and on what authority. Who can also verify the credentials of those who decide what's “black”.
    4. I don't consider the deconstruction of the English language a dialect, a viable speech or creditable form of communication.
    5. If Rocky was black, and the movie managed to avoid being propelled to Net Flix, it may have enjoyed a mild success. Maybe as a “gritty and bold” portrayal of an African American savant forced to box as his only means of survival. Or at least that would be the narrative as described by some white artsy beta male.
    6. I also think that until I begin receiving monetary support, retroactively, from deceased former slave owners, I should refuse to accept the responsibility or ire for any of their actions.
    7. Sometimes I feel as though the liberal mindset in media, academia, entertainment, and so on, treats both races like children. The whites being the biological child, expected to do good and only receiving attention for negative behavior, often becoming resentful with misdirected anger. While black child, the step child, is over compensated for and held to a different standard. When both are prodded out to perform parlor tricks; the white child plays Beethoven’s fifth to a yawn and a “Don't forget to clean your room”. The black stepchild then attempts chopsticks and is met with enthusiastic astonishment and a patronizing round of applause...
These are just 8 random things percolating through the mind of an average white 9-5er, who wouldn't suggest he was racist... Do you think he is racist? Is he allowed to have these thoughts?

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Democracy 2.0

Democracy 2.0

In the book Visions of Tragedy, by Richard B Sewall, there burns a quote that has forever captivated me, “Man is free, but free only to chose his prison”. Though this may not be the actual quote, it's as I remember it. Idiots and pseudo libertarians cry for absolute democracy, as if mob rule equates to a purer form of freedom. Our founders understood that the masses could not be trusted; some influenced by passing fancy, others swept up in the unforgiving pangs of lust. A majority of people has never bested the quality of the few.
The only people promoting democracy are the direct benefactors of it's gluttonous corruption. Democracy 2.0 ignites fantasies of equality and fairness for the intellectually retarded. Our “exempt from reality” academic professors, have convinced us that 60 million souls sharing the same brain are numerically entitled. Having done so, the qualified few are judged as racist, elite, or oppressive. One need look no further than the violent American Unions to see the utter failure of democracy. Democracy = Failure
Democracy 2.0 is the same rat with better references.
I recently read this article on Alternate Right. Until we are able to have an honest conversation, we are doomed. Let's talk about the undeniable cultural  differences. The major cities of this Nation are imploding and no one will address the common thread, race.....


Detroit's Destiny


Detroit's Destiny Nature reclaims Henry Ford's office
This article was originally published 23 March, 2012.
Remember the time you were in class and knew the answer to a question posed by your teacher, but didn’t raise your hand out of fear you might be wrong? Or the time you had a crush on a beautiful girl, but were too afraid to ask her on a date because she might say ‘no’?
Well, we are reaching the political equivalent of that moment—where that self-induced fear and trepidation which precludes us from doing what is rational and natural because of the negative consequences we perceive could arise from such action—with the impending financial collapse of Detroit.
“Impending” is the wrong word. “Imminent” would be, too. “Inevitable” is the apt word.
Why the insolvency of Detroit has been an inevitability now must be stated, because others will raise their hand and supply the wrong answer. The American Thinker will try and blame Democrats and Unions without mentioning that America’s most livable big city, Pittsburgh, is filled with both.
Free Republic won’t allow anyone to even mention the word “Black” in the strange color-blind world the owners of that site have cultivated (with a religious zeal and intensity normally seen in a cult).
Beloved conservative economist Thomas Sowell can state it is due to “liberal social policies,” without acknowledging these same policies are in place in cities that attract corporate investments, like Portland, Seattle, Boulder, and Denver. Others will state that a city under “total Democrat hegemony” for 50 years was bound to collapse, maintaining a desire to stay color-blind even in the face of economic Armageddon.
Michael Barone, famous for stating that Hispanics will save the Republican Party, was in Detroit during the Black riots of late July 1967, still the worst riots this nation has ever seen. He wrote an article for the American Enterprise Institute stating how his politics were shaped by this event. Considering that he advocates the continued mass immigration of a people who in 2006 marched in major American cities waving the Mexican flags defiantly, we have to wonder what exactly Barone learned.
The Weekly Standard published Matt Labash’s ode to Detroit’s collapse back in 2008, where he only in passing pointed out the racial significance of a city’s collapse. (In 1960, Detroit was 76 percent White. Though at the time Blacks represented only 24 percent of the population, there were responsible for 65 percent of the violence crime there):
Somewhere along the way, Detroit became our national ashtray, a safe place for everyone to stub out the butt of their jokes.
It happens, though, when you're from Detroit. In the popular imagination, the Motor City has gone from being the Arsenal of Democracy, so named for their converting auto factories to make the weapons which helped us win World War II, and the incubator of the middle class (now leading the nation in foreclosure rates, Detroit once had the highest rate of home ownership in the country), to being Dysfunction Junction. To Detroit's credit, they've earned it.
How bad is Detroit? It once gave the keys to the city to Saddam Hussein.
Over the last several years, it has ranked as the most murderous city, the poorest city, the most segregated city, as the city with the highest auto-insurance rates, with the bleakest outlook for workers in their 20s and 30s, and as the place with the most heart attacks, slowest income growth, and fewest sunny days. It is a city without a single national grocery store chain. It has been deemed the most stressful metropolitan area in America. Likewise, it has ranked last in numerous studies: in new employment growth, in environmental indicators, in the rate of immunization of 2-year-olds, and, among big cities, in the number of high school or college graduates.
Men's Fitness magazine christened Detroit America's fattest city, while Men's Health called it America's sexual disease capital. Should the editors of these two metrosexual magazines be concerned for their safety after slagging the citizens of a city which has won the "most dangerous" title for five of the last ten years? Probably not: 47 percent of Detroit adults are functionally illiterate.
Precisely what caused all this mess is perhaps best left to historians. Locals' ideas for how it happened could keep one pinned to a barstool for weeks: auto companies failing or pushing out to the suburbs and beyond, white flight caused by the '67 riots and busing orders, the 20-year reign of Mayor Coleman Young who scared additional middle-class whites off with statements such as "The only way to handle discrimination is to reverse it," freeways destroying mass transit infrastructure, ineptitude, corruption, Japanese cars--take your pick.

We no longer have the luxury of such utopian dreams of taking our pick when it comes to placing the blame for Detroit’s monumental collapse; we must deal with the facts as they are and point out that Detroit has become the best friend of budding photographers hoping to publish the next best-selling coffee table book because it is a city that most resembles the dangerous foreign landscapes pictured in National Geographic. (For an actual coffee table book on modern Detroit, check out The Ruins of Detroit, by French photographers Yves Marchand and Romain Meffre .)
Detroit is 82 percent Black. The Great Migration to Detroit of Blacks from the South (exacerbated by Henry Ford’s promise to hire 10 percent of his employees from the Black population) inexorably created White Flight from that city, turning the city once known as “The Paris of the West” into the American version of the Paris Suburbs. Much of the rest of the city been torn down due to neglect.

Detoirt's Woodward Ave. (from The Ruins of Detroit).
That Democrat hegemony bemoaned for ruining the city has been overwhelmingly Black for 40 years, starting with the election of Coleman Young, the first Black mayor in the history of Detroit. The mass exodus of people from the city was primarily White back in the 1960s and '70s (which turned a majority White city into the majority Black mess you have now), but is currently a torrent of Black people fleeing in hopes of finding a place to live with a national grocery chain.
White people fled Black crime then; Black people flee Black crime now.
Mike Brownfield of The Heritage Foundation has said Detroit is “a liberal’s worst nightmare,” but fails to point out that it is Black people fleeing a liberal Black cityto the tune of a 25 percent population decline in 10 years.
What are you afraid of saying Mr. Brownfield? Why can’t you just say Detroit is in trouble because of its majority population (why doesn’t the Detroit Free Pressever run an article that asks, In changing world, Detroit remains overwhelming black?)? Why can’t Dr. Sowell? Why can’t The American Thinker? Why can’tNational Review?
The decline of Detroit (and America’s major cities such as Baltimore, Milwaukee, Memphis, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Cleveland, Newark, New Orleans, Atlanta, Birmingham, Chicago, etc.) is completely racial in nature. Michael Walsh of National Review laments that “some day, we’ll all live in Detroit” without mentioning the fact that Detroit’s lily-white suburbs--where the White descendants of the War of Detroit (the 1967 Black riot) retreated to--are perhaps the nicest in America.
Conservatives must understand that is the Black residents of Detroit who have helped depreciate what was once some of the highest property value in the country to the majority of zip codes in America with the lowest property value.
The Black press seems to understand understands this: The Atlanta Post published a story in 2010 stating that to Abandon Detroit = Abandoning Black America; Detroit post-1967 is a direct representation of Black America.
One mustn’t forget that every student in Detroit now eats for free (courtesy of the state) so that the stigma of being on the free lunch program won’t affect the self-esteem of Black children. As of 2009, more than 300,000 Black residents of Detroit were on food stamps, which equates to 38 percent of the citizenry. One can only guess what that number is now.
With news that Detroit could run out cash by December, Mayor Dave Bing has had to announce massive cuts to the city that contradict the USA Today’s triumphant, front-page, above the fold claim in October of 2011 that Detroit was back! from a few months ago. The Detroit Free Press reported:
Delivering on his pledge to avoid an emergency manager, Mayor Dave Bing said today he will lay off 1,000 employees, implement a hiring freeze and increase his demands on unions to accept 10% pay cuts and deep concessions in health care and pension benefits.

This follows an earlier proclamation from Bing that stopped garbage removal, police patrols and other government services in 20 percent of the city. Who can forget that more than 100 Detroit Department of Transportation bus drivers refused to work and stayed at the Rosa Parks Bus Terminal because of rampaging Black youth (who have helped earn Detroit the honor of America’s Most Dangerous City) attacking them.
That same bus system is so unreliable that LaWanda Flake, a disabled mother of six, recently bartered her home on Craigslist for a van to get her children to school on time. That house once belonged to one of the top Mo’ Town artists (The Supremes), but has since come to represent how quickly property depreciates once Black people assume control of a city.
If Detroit fails, then the unthinkable could happen: Michigan recently passed a “financial martial law” bill which allows the state to assume control of a bankrupt city. Once Detroit fails, an Emergency Manager will put in charge of the city and The American Interest warns us a 21st Century version of a “Plantation” will be created in America:
That’s not the only problem: if the review determines that the city is broke, white Republican officials could end up making decisions that change the fate of a predominantly African American city — imposing cuts in employment, pay, benefits and services that will affect almost everyone who lives in Detroit.
Detroit Free Press columnist Jeff Gerritt lays out what the governor will face if the takeover goes forward:
“Plantation” is a word he’ll hear a lot — in fact, Councilman Kwame Kenyatta already invoked it to describe what would happen if the state took control of the city’s finances in an effort to keep it from running out of money by spring…
Nothing happens in this region outside the context of race. Our often-painful history is the oxygen we breathe, even when we choke on it. We’re all finding it a little hard to breathe just now.
“Plantation” is the wrong word. On actual plantations, people worked. In the case of Detroit, the White Republican “owners” will labor away on behalf of their "slaves."
As Black people flee Detroit and head into the prosperous lily-white suburbs surrounding the city, they ensure that the middle-class areas will continue to shrink.
The classic 1980s film Robocop teased at that truth when the CEO of OCP said, “Old Detroit has a cancer. That cancer is crime.” In Hollywood’s Detroit, multi-racial gangs, made up primarily of White males, prevailed.
Detroit faces a dual problem of spiking murder rates and a police force that is either incompetent or, increasingly, absent. This has led many residents to take the law into their own hands. The Daily reports, in an article entitled “911 is a Joke”:
Justifiable homicide in the city shot up 79 percent in 2011 from the previous year, as citizens in the long-suffering city armed themselves and took matters into their own hands. The local rate of self-defense killings now stands 2,200 percent above the national average. Residents, unable to rely on a dwindling police force to keep them safe, are fighting back against the criminal scourge on their own. And they’re offering no apologies.
Black dysfunction has, ironically, realized the dream of Reason magazine and Anarcho-Capitalists—a laissez-faire city with few government services. In Detroit, the dream is a nightmare.
In the span of only a few months, two of the former industrial giants that represented America’s once mighty manufacturing base will have become virtually insolvent. Sad that 72 percent Black Birmingham, Alabama, was responsible for the bankruptcy of Jefferson County.
Now, it is precisely those who comprise the 82 percent share of Detroit’s population that will be responsible for the financial ruin of that city, because they were incapable of sustaining the civilization that was left behind to them.
Only a few people will raise their hand and give the correct answer as to why "the Motor City" is finally out of gas.
To admit that Detroit is a failure because of its majority population is not possible in the political climate of 2012 America. To do so would undermine the political aim and drive of what this writer has dubbed “Black-Run America” (BRA).
This does not mean that Black people run actually America—far from it—but that America (corporate, religious, government, legal system, entertainment, etc.) is run for the advancement of Black people, and that to publicly say anything negative about Black people is, more or less, against the law of the land.
The National Question can’t be properly answered until we have the courage to proclaim the truth of Detroit’s demise. "Liberalism," "socialism," the "Democrat-controlled political class" are all partial, insufficient answers at best.
It’s about race, stupid.

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The Sarin has been mixed!

Deadly Sarin gas has been mixed. I can really picture despot Assad, tonight watching Fox news and going, "Oh s@$#, now their accusing me of this? I can't win." Finally, the West can justify publicly pulling the trigger on this brutal dictator.

Korean father murdered by black man

Black man kills Korean father

Upon reading my headline, you may wonder when this occurred. Try this “ Man gets shoved to his death in N.Y. Subway” While the race of the killer is irrelevant to me, I can't help but to wonder, what if the headline read, “Black patron violently shoved to his death by angry white” However before we become derailed by the blatant bias of the American press, lets look elsewhere. Something no one but me, Glock Russman, has mentioned. Forget about the Times photographer who just happen to be there, who by the way, valiantly flashed his camera bulbs to alert the train. (lol idiot needed the flash for the pic)
What about the on-lookers who had ample time to reach for the victim? People who were much closer than the helpless Time's guy, they made no effort. They were quick to photo the dead Korean father of one, limp and lifeless. I will be the first to ask, “Is there no public outrage that people stood by unengaged?” “Why is the press not covering this atrocity” What's more mind boggling, a random lone nut shoving another to his death? Or people within reach, waiting for the train to pummel this poor man?
My questions
  1. Who were these people close by who offered not help?
  2. What color were they? Again, what color were they?
    There it is! Is this why the media is silent? The color of the one lookers? We haven’t been told, but I surmise if the cowardly witnesses were white, this story would be on fire.


    Remember the more we're divided, the greater their control. They love us hating each other.